Russia is angry. The US is angry. Ukraine is angry. The 30 NATO Nations are angry. China is angry, The People are angry, and hatred is on the increase.
Multitudes, multitudes in the Valley of Decision: for the day of the LORD is near in the Valley of Decision. Joel 3:14
—— Original Message ——
From: ray ray
To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Senator_Kennedy@Kennedy.senate.gov; Senator_Merkley@Merkley.senate.gov; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 6:46 AM
Whether you’re a Believer or an Atheist, if you believe the 24/7 News Today, this world has finally arrived at this point of the Living Bible and the Revelation of Jesus Christ,
And the nations were angry, and your wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that you should give reward to your servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear your name, small and great; and should destroy them which destroy the earth […] Therefore rejoice, you heavens, and you that dwell in them. (the kingdom of heaven is WITHIN you) Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has but a short time.
The steady escalation Day by Day is inevitably leading this World to the fulfillment of these Biblical Prophecies as written, ‘Behold, I come as a thief – For behold, the Lord shall come with FIRE, and like a tempest, His chariots, to render His anger with FURY, and His rebuke with flames of FIRE. For with fire, will the Lord contend, and with His sword with all flesh, and those slain by the Lord shall be many.’
That will take this form, never possible before our Generations:
The attached files are the Historical SIGNS of that possibility if the Direction is not changed.
The Kansas City Times, September 13, 1976, ‘Prophet Chooses Park For Vigil’
The Kansas City Times, November 2, 1976, (ALL SOULS DAY) ‘Prophet Plans Appeal Of Conviction’
The US put “FIRE and FURY like the World has never seen” on the table in 2017, and it’s still there. The US is the only Power to drop nuclear bombs on Civilian populations when it was the only Nation to have them. If it happened once already, it could happen again.
The United States has been arming and training Ukrainian fascist combatants in secret locations.
- The CIA training program began in 2015 which suggests there must have been a plan for goading Russia into invading. Nothing would have been left to chance. Strategic planners must have settled on what provocations they would use. (like the threat of NATO membership)
- Official Washington never thought the Ukrainian army could prevail against a conflict with the Russian Army, which suggests that the media’s stories about “the brave Ukrainian resistance” are reckless propaganda designed to garner greater public support.
- The country of Ukraine and the Ukrainian people are of no interest to the United States. Ukraine is only valuable in as much as it provides a staging ground (and the manpower) for Washington to prosecute a war against Russia.
- The clear strategic objective of the CIA program is to create an “Afghanistan-type” quagmire for Russia that will deplete its resources, inflict massive reputational damage, and kill as many Russian servicemen as possible.
- The ultimate goal of the CIA-generated insurgency is to destroy the Russian economy, isolate the Russian leadership, and send home as many Russian boys in body-bags as possible in order to affect a regime change that will replace arch-rival Putin with a compliant stooge like Ukrainian Puppet Zelensky.
- All the evidence suggests that the developments on the ground– including the luring of Russian troops into Ukraine– is part of a long-standing strategic plan to prevent the economic integration of Russia and Europe in order to control China’s development and preserve US hegemony into the next century. Thus, current US foreign policy can be summarized in just 10 words: “We’ll deal with Russia first, then move on to China.
For the last 5 years, I’ve commented regularly in The Washington Post in many articles on the US-Russia War since the end of WWII.
February 28 I posted this comment,
When Western governments declare it’s goal and objective is to destroy the Russian Economy without using bombs, Armageddon/WWIII already started.
History proves it’s much easier to start Wars than to end them. It took 20 years and $2 TRILLION for the US to extricate itself from the humiliating defeat in Afghanistan.
I expect Putin will use the ‘nuclear option’ in the Economic War and will turn off Nordstream I, and all oil and gas pipelines passing through Ukraine to keep Western Europe Economies going.
The question will be who can endure material privation and want longer? Russians who are accustomed to it, or Western Europeans who aren’t, when both the Russian and European Economies crash?
The comment was deleted instantly, and I was suspended from making any other comments for a week.
In the past, when I posted a clear incisive comment, The Washington Post just deleted it along with the whole thread in response.
So much for the accusation only Putin censors dissent from the Official Propaganda narrative.
I’m accustomed to that kind of silencing or Cancel Culture. In 1977, I stood up on the Sparks Street Mall in Ottawa, CanaDa to exercise my Democratic Right of Freedom of speech to growing crowds who stopped to listen. The Police stopped the speech even though the Ottawa Newspapers reported the crowd demanded the Police leave me alone to continue speaking.
I was arrested for “shouting causing a disturbance” and locked up in maximum security, solitary confinement, for 5 days before appearing in front of a Judge.
I had about 12 charges at trial, convicted, and put on probation for 1 year with only 1 condition typed in at the bottom of the probation form with these explicit terms, “not to attend on the Sparks Street Mall or any other Street in Ottawa for the purpose of SPEAKING or shouting” and eventually sent to jail for the 1st Time in my life for breach of that UN-Democratic probation.
Getting out of jail, I phoned the Ottawa Citizen Newspaper saying to the News Editor, “you projected a positive image but now would you like to talk about the substance?”
The answer was direct, “you’re not news anymore.” At least in Ottawa. That was not an absolute since after that, newspapers in CanaDa chronicled my personal Voyage of Faith coast to coast spread over many years.
7 thoughts on “THE NATIONS ARE ANGRY……”
Vladimir Putin’s apparent fear of NATO expansion, though especially the deployment of additional U.S. anti-nuclear-missile defense systems, further into eastern Europe is typically perceived by the West as unmerited paranoia. Surely he must realize that the West, including NATO, won’t initiate a nuclear-weapons exchange.
Then, again, how can he — or we, for that matter — know for sure, particularly with the U.S.?
For example, while Ronald Reagan postulated that “Of the four wars in my lifetime none came about because the U.S. was too strong,” who can know what may have historically come to fruition had the U.S. remained the sole possessor of atomic weaponry. There’s a presumptive, and perhaps even arrogant, concept of American governance as somehow, unless physically provoked, being morally/ethically above using nuclear weapons internationally. (After all, absolute power can corrupt absolutely.)
After President Harry S. Truman relieved General Douglas MacArthur as commander of the forces warring with North Korea — for the latter’s remarks about using many atomic bombs to promptly end the war — Americans’ approval-rating of the president dropped to 23 percent. It was still a record-breaking low, even lower than the worst approval-rating points of the presidencies of Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson.
Had it not been for the formidable international pressure on Truman (and perhaps his personal morality) to relieve MacArthur as commander, could/would Truman eventually have succumbed to domestic political pressure to allow MacArthur’s command to continue?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Harry Truman who created the CIA, wanted it hauled in for it’s excesses.
The Washington Post December 22, 1963 – page A11
Harry Truman Writes: Limit CIA Role To Intelligence
By Harry S Truman Copyright, 1963, by Harry S Truman
INDEPENDENCE, MO., Dec. 21 — I think it has become necessary to take another look at the purpose and operations of our Central Intelligence Agency—CIA. At least, I would like to submit here the original reason why I thought it necessary to organize this Agency during my Administration, what I expected it to do and how it was to operate as an arm of the President.
I think it is fairly obvious that by and large a President’s performance in office is as effective as the information he has and the information he gets. That is to say, that assuming the President himself possesses a knowledge of our history, a sensitive understanding of our institutions, and an insight into the needs and aspirations of the people, he needs to have available to him the most accurate and up-to-the-minute information on what is going on everywhere in the world, and particularly of the trends and developments in all the danger spots in the contest between East and West. This is an immense task and requires a special kind of an intelligence facility.
Of course, every President has available to him all the information gathered by the many intelligence agencies already in existence. The Departments of State, Defense, Commerce, Interior and others are constantly engaged in extensive information gathering and have done excellent work.
But their collective information reached the President all too frequently in conflicting conclusions. At times, the intelligence reports tended to be slanted to conform to established positions of a given department. This becomes confusing and what’s worse, such intelligence is of little use to a President in reaching the right decisions.
Therefore, I decided to set up a special organization charged with the collection of all intelligence reports from every available source, and to have those reports reach me as President without department “treatment” or interpretations.
I wanted and needed the information in its “natural raw” state and in as comprehensive a volume as it was practical for me to make full use of it. But the most important thing about this move was to guard against the chance of intelligence being used to influence or to lead the President into unwise decisions—and I thought it was necessary that the President do his own thinking and evaluating.
Since the responsibility for decision making was his—then he had to be sure that no information is kept from him for whatever reason at the discretion of any one department or agency, or that unpleasant facts be kept from him. There are always those who would want to shield a President from bad news or misjudgments to spare him from being “upset.”
For some time I have been disturbed by the way CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government. This has led to trouble and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas.
I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations. Some of the complications and embarrassment I think we have experienced are in part attributable to the fact that this quiet intelligence arm of the President has been so removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue—and a subject for cold war enemy propaganda.
With all the nonsense put out by Communist propaganda about “Yankee imperialism,“ ”exploitive capitalism,“ ”war-mongering,“ ”monopolists,” in their name-calling assault on the West, the last thing we needed was for the CIA to be seized upon as something akin to a subverting influence in the affairs of other people.
I well knew the first temporary director of the CIA, Adm. Souers, and the later permanent directors of the CIA, Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg and Allen Dulles. These were men of the highest character, patriotism and integrity—and I assume this is true of all those who continue in charge.
But there are now some searching questions that need to be answered. I, therefore, would like to see the CIA be restored to its original assignment as the intelligence arm of the President, and that whatever else it can properly perform in that special field—and that its operational duties be terminated or properly used elsewhere.
We have grown up as a nation, respected for our free institutions and for our ability to maintain a free and open society. There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanx. I copied and saved this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I tried to find the link to the original Truman Washington Post Op-ed, but have been unsuccessful. Maybe the CIA had the Google algorithm hide it? If you can find it, please post it here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you search Google for “Harry Truman Writes: Limit CIA Role To Intelligence The Washington Post December 22, 1963” there are lots of results, just not the original Washington Post article.
It’s like CNN & MSNBC never hesitated to repeat over and over again for days, anything that discredited the Trump Administration except for showing, probably at the request of the CIA, his Secretary of State pompous Pompeo in front of a friendly University audience cheering him on when he said, “I was CIA Director. We Lied, we cheated, we stole. It’s – it was like – We had entire training courses. It reminds you of the glory of the American Experiment.”
That’s BLIND American Patriotism for you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
NATO is the White Horse of Revelation and its rider is the White House. It was unsealed on Purim 2003 when it launched its first self-righteous ‘war on terror’, a terror itself perpetrated by killing its own citizens on 9-11. God’s divides time into days, weeks, months, years, weeks of years and jubilees. During the final jubilee, three weeks of years are allotted to the White Horse, expiring on Purim 2024. That will begin a one month period of disaster, first financial then nuclear, when the Red Horse is unsealed and the world enters a 7-14 year period when regional wars will devastate the whole earth. The first of those will be the Bear tearing 3 ribs from the Eagle, vapourizing NYC, LA & DC on Passover night, 2024.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I also thought the US is the White Horse in the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse. The MSM is the unmentioned 5th Horseman of the Apocalypse. NATO is the instrument of US Power.
In 1981, I hitch hiked from Ottawa to Whitehorse in the Yukon and back, a 6700 mile Voyage of Faith, to draw attention to the other White Horse described in Revelation 19:11 and 20 years later we saw 9/11.
This is the last paragraph in the article https://rayjc.com/2011/08/28/the-revelation-of-jesus-christ-from-1911-to-911/
IMAGINING THE TRANSFORMING EVENT
In December 1998, Former US Defence Secretary Ash Carter, US Undersecretary of Defence John Deutch and Philip Zelikow, Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, colluded to write this in Foreign Affairs Journal,
A successful attack with weapons of mass destruction could certainly take thousands, or tens of thousands, of lives. If the device that exploded in 1993 under the World Trade Center had been nuclear, or had effectively dispersed a deadly pathogen, the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it.
Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949.
Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either further terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks.
I find it curious it happened just like that 3 years later, and one of the Authors was able to control what information the 9/11 Commission was able to see?
LikeLiked by 1 person